Ducie’s work is a cocktail mix of the best
elements of fantasy, both classic and contemporary. A debut author, Joe
Ducie, concocts his merry story like a bartender would mix me my tequila
and pineapple juice: fast, sweet, sexy, and strong. Both the
descriptive factors and the characters taste familiarly of the Dark Tower and the Dresden Files.
This is a tale of love lost, redemption unfound, the schemes men make
for power, and the remaking and unmaking of worlds. It’s a descent into
madness and chaos, and it’s a helluva ride.
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
Stiff by Mary Roach
Roach approaches life and death and the
strange topics that most would find distasteful with a light touch and a
humorous voice. Her little sidebar footnotes are terrific and often
funny to read. Throughout the book, she sprinkles her opinions and
confusions and own ideas, giving the prose a distinctly living taste.
But never is Roach disrespectful to the cadavers or those who donate
their bodies, which I think is an important factor that makes this book
popular.
I love reading nonfiction literature. It
is a breadth of knowledge that is as valuable to human imagination as
great fiction. I was skeptical when I first decided to open “Stiff.” A
book about cadavers isn’t my regular cup of tea, but I’ve come to
realize that what we need is to step out of our comfort zones once and a
while. I think we’d all be a little mildly, delightfully surprised at
what find. For example, I pleasantly learned that cadavers had a hand in
testing the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin, in France’s first
guillotines, heart transplants, solving the mystery of the TWA Flight
800, and the first blood transfusions. In their silent, unassuming, and
unpretentious way, cadavers have been working to make life better for
those left behind.
Tuesday, 19 February 2013
Book Review: Foundation by Isaac Asimov
“Foundation” is an entertaining piece of
sociopolitical SF in the backdrop of a space opera. This book is the
foundation of SF for the past six decades. Asimov’s prose is
clear and concise, without any room for ambiguity or vain style.
Asimov’s words, though pared down and stripped of subtext, are not any
less true or beautiful or witty.
Set thousands of years in the
future, after humanity has colonized millions of planets in our galaxy,
“Foundation” introduces the Galactic Empire is in its waning years. One
man on the capital planet of Trantor, Hari Seldon, predicts the
cataclysmic and chaotic decline and fall of the Empire. Seldon has
developed the science of psychohistory, which aims to calculate the
behaviour of mass populations over the course of events using, among
other things, socioeconomic trends. Seldon has predetermined not only
the demise of the Empire, but that thirty millennia of barbarism will
follow, unless his organization, the Foundation, is able to finish its
gargantuan mission of cataloguing and preserving all accumulated human
knowledge and history. The act would serve to lessen an inevitable
thirty-thousand years to a mere thousand.
Asimov portrays the epic grandeur of the galaxy through the unyielding arc of time and history. Individual lives are ineffectual, though not inconsequential, in the grand scheme of things. Throughout the stories, there is a pervading sense of ‘greater good’ or ‘the bigger picture’. There is only one recurring character in each of the five tales: the Foundation. It stands in the background, an entity both mysterious and arresting; a godlike presence that shaped religion and ruled a city. The story of the Foundation is portrayed through the periodic snippets of human life throughout the growth of the First Foundation from an indefensible, dependent, colony in the backwaters of the outskirts of a great empire to a massive political juggernaut with commercial and technological prowess. The central characters: Hari Seldon, Gaal Dornick, Salvor Hardin, Linmar Ponyets, and Hober Mallow are seen in flashes as their importance and contribution to the longevity of the Foundation is waxes and wanes.Asimov has an arresting flair for conjuring up a methodical, articulate, and complex history. In the battle for free will over determinism, Asimov’s “Foundation” falls securely into the side of the determinists. Psychology and economic trends and the insurmountable turn of time dominate the short stories with a sense of inevitability. But it the tone of the story is far from pessimistic. There is only ever the slightest indication that they should lose hope, or that individual lives are meaningless. As one character says, “Seldon’s laws help those who help themselves.” Asimov appears to advocate forging a better future through the sole and collective action of the present.Unquestionably, “Foundation” is an intellectual treat that tends to emphasis the background scenes as opposed to the ones that illustrate more action. Most of the book is exposition and dialogues between characters in a meeting over smokes. The third story, The Mayors, provides the most exciting, and arguably cleverest, climactic confrontation in the book. It is a scene between Mayor Hardin and Prince Regent Wienis. Hardin, in a stroke of brilliance, has manipulated events to stave off a rival political party’s attempt to impeach him and end the threat posed by the Four Kingdoms.“Foundation” is a significant to the genre in more ways than the ideas it challenged us with. It is the culmination of science fiction into a literature encompassing reason and ideas. It reinvigorated the genre and turned it into a platform of higher ideals and concepts. “Foundation” steered it away from the pulp swamp creatures. It did for science fiction what “Spiderman” (2002) did for superhero movies, or in particular, what Christopher Nolan’s “Batman Begins” (2005) reboot did for the franchise. Asimov gives us excellent characters, complex sociopolitics, and a good story that never wanes.
Book Review: FreakAngels Vol. 1 by Warren Ellis
Originally a free webcomic that was released every Friday, this collects the first 24 issues. Twelve children were born in England at exactly the same moment. They exhibit psychic abilities at varying degrees. Six years ago, the world ended in an undisclosed cataclysm that has left civilization in ruins. Now, at 23, they try to piece together their lives in Whitechapel, maybe the last real settlement in flooded London. They are the self-proclaimed Freakangels, the councilors and protectors of Whitechapel. Of the original twelve, only eleven remain.
This opening arc begins with a girl named Alice walking into Whitechapel, wielding a shotgun, and crying out for the Freakangels. When they detox her of the subliminal junk in her brain, Alice serves as a placeholder for the readers. Her tour of steampunk Whitechapel is our introduction to this strange, new world. She may even be a reference to “Alice in Wonderland”. She certainly left behind normalcy and entered a very different world.
Warren Ellis is a clever writer who allows the reader to glimpse fragments of the plot. He alludes to the developing backstory, unravels lengthy exchanges depicting the interpersonal relationship among his large ensemble of characters. The best asset of “FreakAngels” is the brilliant dialogue. Ellis has a masterful touch for regional accents; the characters are distinguished by variances in speeches: KK, for example, is bemused and snarky, while Luke sounds bitter and indifferent. The British overtones are thick in the air and the dry humor punctuates the punk teens’ exchanges.
Paul Duffield is a fantastic artist. The purple eyes, the scenic landscape, the authoritative command of colors really bring out the somber atmosphere of post-apocalyptic Whitechapel.
This is a neat achievement in webcomic publishing. Ellis is consistent in his prominent intellectualism and unbridled vulgarity. The sociocultural themes are apparent throughout the story. Despite the steampunk motifs (Victorian-style corsets, stunning inventiveness), the essence of the story more inclined towards the post-apocalyptic field, as it charts the progress of rebuilding and redemption.
Book Review: When Patty Went to College by Jean Webster
Patty Wyatt could have been a politician had she been born in a more modern time. She can be described as charismatic and imperturbable,
carefree and creative, lazy and intelligent, fun-loving and reckless.
Throughout the book, in spite of Patty’s misadventures, clever antics,
and pranks on her fellow classmates to entertain herself, she is well
liked by her friends and faculty. As Cathy Fair tells her in the
denouement to the final story, “I’ve always liked you,
Patty,—everybody does,—but I don’t believe I’ve ever appreciated you,
and I’m glad to find it out before we leave college.” She can be a
trifle judgmental, cuts church, and can hardly be moved to study more
than she absolutely has to, and yet, whenever Patty is confronted
between the right choice and the easy way out, she displays a strong
sense of morality and honesty in spite of the consequences. I like her
character. Patty is easygoing and yet proactive; you just know that if
she were the recipient of an anonymous benefactor to study at college,
she wouldn’t be inclined to send monthly letters to her mysterious
figure. No, Patty Wyatt would have tracked him down and pulled aside the
curtains to reveal Jervis Pendelton before her first letter even
arrived in his mailbox. Judy’s story is one sprawling adventure spread
over her collection of chronicling letters; Patty’s story is a
collection of all these tiny adventures that compose one book. I wonder
if she drank coffee.
The book lacked cohesion in its narrative.
Each story was a snapshot of life from the beginning to end of her last
year in college and yet I couldn’t help but feel like it was missing a
unifying theme or oscillating purpose. Some of the stories concentrated
on Patty’s dilemmas involving owning up to her faults and confessing;
these pieces connected in their purpose of showing Patty’s gradual
maturity.
In context, the relatively heavy-handed
moralizing in some of Patty’s tales is to be expected. This was a novel
written in the early 20th century for children and
adolescents. It could have been far worst. Traces of Webster’s
first-wave feminism shine through and are as strong as they are in her
later writing. She explores contemporary issues such as women’s rights,
women’s education, socialism, and gender roles with an air of a bygone
era’s lightheartedness. On the whole, I would classify this as lighter
than “Daddy” or “Dear Enemy,” which I find to be Webster’s most serious
endeavor. I liked this novel on its own merit. The glimpse into life of a
bygone time and place, into the world that Jean Webster occupied for
years, was worth the read.
Book Review: The Rules of Attraction by Bret Easton Ellis
“The Rules of Attraction” is
fundamentally a story that studies the rules of attraction that exist
between affluent students in a college town. Plot is unnecessary. The
traditional aspects of stories are accessories. The important stuff is
in the questions that are asked: Who will you hook up with tonight? What
are you going to wear at the party? How do you get laid here? Who do we
need to see to get drugs? Through satire and dark comedy, Ellis
portrays the corruption of youth and the discrepancy between reality and
fiction. This exaggerated and distorted manner in showcasing campus
life hones the reader’s awareness to these particular realities.
The portrait of campus life for these students
is heavily aided by the shifting first-person which illustrates the
varying priorities that are juggled throughout the year and paints
events from multiple angles. The reader’s interpretation is an essential
part of understanding the story. Paul’s narratives focus on his sexual
encounters with Sean, while Sean leaves them out entirely in his,
leaving the actuality of their occurrence ambiguous. These uncertain
passages give weight to the novel and force the readers to perceive the
development of the characters.
Bret Easton Ellis does a
fantastic job in displaying a segment of society that perhaps many
readers are not a part of, if they even knew existed. He creates
characters that are selfish, nihilistic, world-weary,
experimental, callous, and narcissistic. He does it without batting an
eye. They are interesting to watch and study, but I don’t think I’d
invite them over for dinner.
Day 33: Misery Loves Comedy by Ivan Brunetti
This case study of schizophrenia and psychosis collects Ivan Brunetti’s first three issues of the brilliant comic book series Schizo,
as well as a agglomeration of miscellaneous musings and writings from
over a decade. Brunetti’s self-caricature is intriguing realistic, in
all its foibles and flaws: he is paranoid, deluded, graphically
scatological, self-loathing, and violently depressed. But behind
Brunetti’s fascinating nihilism, is a study of the darkest corners of
human nature and an exploration of that selfish, brutish side of
ourselves that we shudder to inspect closely.
Day 32: The Book of Lost Things by John Connolly
For a thriller writer, “The Book of Lost Things”
presents a major step in a different, though not altogether unpleasant,
direction. Connelly explores the story of a boy during World War 2 who
experiences an adventure not unlike Carroll’s Alice. Connelly’s take on
classic fairy tales and giving them a new perspective was one of the
most positive aspects of the narrative. The ending is beautifully, and
unexpectedly, bittersweet and touching. Overall, it is a wonderful
coming-of-age book with a bend towards the nostalgic past.
Day 31: The Art of War by Sun Tzu
This ancient and informative text is as essential to classical
warfare as it is to modern business. Sun Tzu’s great textbook is a
series of profound advice. Their greatest asset is how applicable and
malleable his rules and advice are given the context and circumstance.
It is a truly captivating work and a look into the minds that dominated
the craft of war.
Day 30: Y: The Last Man - Book One by Brian K. Vaughn
Day 29: Animal Farm by George Orwell
Day 28: Die Trying by Lee Child
Day 27: Grimms Fairy Tales (Folio Society)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)