There is an unmistakable, and probably
justified, prejudice against children’s novels being enjoyable for adult
tastes. I mean there are surely good kid books, from beloved classics
like “Heidi” or “Daddy Long Legs” to modern tales like the Lemony
Snicket and Harry Potter series. But overall, adults don’t read
children’s books and there is a good reason for that. Not to say that
they’re all crap, but the black-and-white morality, simplistic
storylines, and straightforward character interactions tend to conflict
with the expectations of an adult world and the preferences of an adult
mindset.
Joey Harker, an average boy, discovers he
is a Walker, a being with an ability to cross from Earth to another in
an endless continuum of alternate universes. As soon as he discovers his
ability, he is targeted by the forces of magic and science who want to
strip him, and alternate versions of Harker across the multiverse, of
his Walking ability to fuel their ships. Harker is recruited by an
organization called InterWorld, operated by different versions of
Harker, which seeks to maintain balance between magic and science.
“Interworld” is a children’s novel. The
storyline is simple, almost formulaic, but the way in which Gaiman and
Reaves write the story make it feel more than going through the motions.
There is real excitement in how they portray their universe (or
universes, to be clear). The villains are cartoonish and there is never a
sense of moral ambiguity amongst the characters or in their decisions.
Evil is evil, no matter in what world you’re on. I think that is perhaps
the book’s greatest flaw.
What makes up for it though is Gaiman and
Reaves’ excellent worldbuilding skills. The mythology underlying
“Interworld” is impeccable and captivating. They construct a fantastic
universe that seems a shame not to return to. Despite the concept of
alternate universes, the authors allude to pop culture and history with
great ease. There are numerous references to popular events, some of
which a thirteen-year-old reader should have no appreciation for.
Likewise, Gaiman and Reaves make fantastic use of clever fantasy tropes
and high scientific concepts, both fictional and real. They do not
underestimate their readers’ capacity to understand ideas, a notion
which seems to escape many children’s writers today.
No comments:
Post a Comment